Commentary for Bava Batra 185:5

התם משום דמספקא לן דאיכא למימר מקמה אתא ומביעתותא הפילה ואיכא למימר מאחורה אתא ומינגח נגחה והפילה הוי ממון המוטל בספק וכל ממון המוטל בספק חולקין

[Now. if, in monetary matters, one is guided, as Rab asserted, by the majority rule,] why [does the owner of the ox only pay a quarter of the loss]? Let it be said, 'Be guided [by what] most cows [do]', and most cows conceive and give birth [to live calves] and the miscarriage must, [consequently], have been due to the goring!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the owner of the ox should, therefore, have had to refund half the loss. But since the law is not so, how can Rab assert that in monetary matters the majority rule is followed? ');">⁹</span> — There, [the majority rule is inapplicable] because there is the uncertainty whether the [ox] approached from the front,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Frightening the cow by its approach and causing miscarriage. For loss caused by fright no liability is incurred (cf. B.K. 56a). ');">¹⁰</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 185:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.